After having the usual D.O.S. attacks on my site and personal L.A.N., we are back again as the U.S. led aggression in Syria continues to get ever more grim, and Americans stay ever more ignorant.
I suppose most people don't realize that the Russian Republic maintains a warm-water naval base in Syria. Russia also was the primary oil contractor in pre-"revolutionary" Libya, and is the primary foreign oil partner along with China, in Iran.
So perhaps the United States should rein-in its' regional proxy before Washington winds up facing the Russians and Chinese in a hot, non-proxy war.
Russia has apparently supplied Syria with advanced anti-aircraft and anti-shipping missile systems, this is not because the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists the United States is arming and equipping have obtained fighter aircraft or attack boats.
Like the post-war United States, Israeli governments seem to believe that they have authority to do whatever they like outside their own borders, all for "preemptive security" of course.
Is that why Israel launched a nuclear strike outside Damascus this month? Strange that the use of a nuclear weapon should barely make the news here in America.
Oh wait, it was OUR ALLY that did that, and not some Islamic state or Communist dictatorship.
Israel might want to stop aiding Muslim extremists, but since they've already helped the Muslim Brotherhood and several Al Qaeda factions take over neighboring Egypt, it's interesting to speculate why.
Has a deal been struck with the United States-led world triumvirate to allow the Muslim Brotherhood to replace secular Arab, Egyptian, and Iranian governments in exchange for peace with Israel?
Or have the "great powers" simply returned to plying the "great game" of the 19th century?
We all know how well that worked out, correct?
After the failed revolutionary movements of 1848, the pseudo-aristocracy of the emerging industrial classes and the remaining REAL aristocracy of the landed, governing classes, met in a series of conclaves not unlike our latter-day Bilderbergers that the historians call the Congresses of Vienna ("Bing" it, since I know your public school history course never mentioned them).
At these congresses the ruling classes threw a few bones to nationalist movements to tamp down regional unrest that was destabilizing Italy and the Germanic states while making moves to ensure the continuing domination of existing financial, trading, and resource markets by the ruling interests.
The newly unified nations of Italy and Germany, with strong, centralized governments epitomized, by Garibaldi and Bismark, were supposed to keep the threatening masses of their regions at bay while providing military bulwarks against encroachments from the Ottoman Empire and Russia.
What actually occurred were a series of wars that bled the continent for the next half-century, culminating in the disaster of the First World War, which destroyed the Ottomans and Czarist Russia, but left chaos and a Marxist revolutionary state in its wake. Russia would spend the next twenty-five years locked in a three-way civil war, while in the West, all the border-drawing and deal-making of the old guards of Europe couldn't contain the violence and emergent nationalism of peoples long abused by just such rulers.
The peoples "betters" failed, repeatedly and miserably. Their control of financial and resource markets led to a series of "panics" and then the Great Depression. Their monopoly of force and authoritarian governments led to Statism and genocide. Religion, press and media, social and hard sciences, along with the newly emerging phenomena of celebrity, were all pressed into service of the states, with various theorists of the human condition telling their fellows how smart the new rulers were.
The new centralized states were scientific marvels, not the thuggery of medieval cretins who slashed and burned their recalcitrant populations, the lower classes would be freed from their ignorance and suffering by submission to the scientifically designed state.
And the whole thing collapsed into the worst degradation of the human species in the history of the world, called World War Two.
But then, just as now, the ruling minorities did very well for themselves, profiteering and consolidating power and resources with abandon.
Then as now, the ruling minorities armed thugs and sent them into the streets with state authority to beat unwilling populations into submission.
Then as now, statist governments passed laws that gave them unlimited powers over the lives, labor and property of their peoples; not that this made anything they did anymore lawful than the gun that a mugger holds to your head while robbing you does.
The people that languished in the prisons and died in the gulags were all robbed, abused, and murdered with lawful propriety.
Then as now, two sets of laws and two sets of outcomes were practiced: one for the slaves and one for the few.
The next conflagration is going to make the failures of the old order seem like paradise by comparison.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Monday, May 27, 2013
Blissful Ignorance and War Crimes in the M.E.
Reports are showing up around the world of a tactical nuclear strike in Syria by the nation of Israel. Reports are now coming out of losses suffered by Israeli forces, including downing of fighter aircraft and the sinking of a nuclear-armed Dolphin-class submarine by Syrian defense forces as the State of Israel continues to meddle in the region's civil war.
Turkey has also reportedly lost a wing of F-15 fighter jets and has suffered casualties from troops it has infiltrated into the combat zone of its regional neighbor.
Israeli forces are now said to fear a massive retaliation, by both the Syrians and by Hezbollah from Lebanon. The Russian Republic moved a large naval contingent into the area and Putin's government has issued plain warning about any further Israeli interference in the war.
If Israel has used nuclear weapons against Syria, what will be the outcome? What should be the consequences for such an act of war?
As the United States backed Muslim Brotherhood forces lose the conflict in Syria and international powers like Russia block more NATO-led intervention in the region, it looks like the current American regime of butchering anyone you don't like in the third world may well have led to the criminal use of an atomic weapon of mass destruction by a supposed non-combatant nation, one openly allied with the United States.
If Iran, North Korea, or any other state had illegally used a nuclear weapon, the U.S.A. would be invading within hours "to punish the guilty."
If our closest ally in the Middle East has committed this act of nuclear terrorism, the future of U.S. leadership in the world is now at risk, as is the ability of American and Western States to ensure the safety of Israel.
I doubt the Israeli government would use such a weapon without at least notifying the White House that they intended to do so...
Time for someone to be asking the right questions.
Turkey has also reportedly lost a wing of F-15 fighter jets and has suffered casualties from troops it has infiltrated into the combat zone of its regional neighbor.
Israeli forces are now said to fear a massive retaliation, by both the Syrians and by Hezbollah from Lebanon. The Russian Republic moved a large naval contingent into the area and Putin's government has issued plain warning about any further Israeli interference in the war.
If Israel has used nuclear weapons against Syria, what will be the outcome? What should be the consequences for such an act of war?
As the United States backed Muslim Brotherhood forces lose the conflict in Syria and international powers like Russia block more NATO-led intervention in the region, it looks like the current American regime of butchering anyone you don't like in the third world may well have led to the criminal use of an atomic weapon of mass destruction by a supposed non-combatant nation, one openly allied with the United States.
If Iran, North Korea, or any other state had illegally used a nuclear weapon, the U.S.A. would be invading within hours "to punish the guilty."
If our closest ally in the Middle East has committed this act of nuclear terrorism, the future of U.S. leadership in the world is now at risk, as is the ability of American and Western States to ensure the safety of Israel.
I doubt the Israeli government would use such a weapon without at least notifying the White House that they intended to do so...
Time for someone to be asking the right questions.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
What Else Aren't the American People Being Told?
We've certainly seen enough accidents and natural disasters lately.
But, what about so many of these events that were in the media cycle for a day or two, and then disappeared from the radar?
There were several man-made events these past few months that leave one wondering just what is going on?
We had several oil pipeline failures around the time the debate over pipeline construction was in the media, some of those dumped quite a bit of crude in places like Arkansas, were these incidents coincidences, or acts of sabotage by anti-development extremists?
The explosion of the fertilizer plant in Texas has been knocked off the news by recent events, who or what caused that massive explosion?
Other chemical facilities have experienced incidents, are these industrial accidents, or attacks on infrastructure?
While the recent spate of road and bridge failures appear to be nothing more than government dereliction of duty and criminal negligence, if our bridges are so weakened that a minor incident can bring them down, how susceptible to a terror attack would our roads and highways be?
With the long-running problems at a couple of nuclear plants back in the news, we need to know if the atomic energy industry is in as bad a shape as the rest of the country's infrastructure.
Like our outdated and failing power networks, or our water, sewage, and garbage systems.
Strange that these government types can find all the money they need to put a rifle to the heads of the people, but can't fix the damn roads.
You know, the job you steal extra money from us for deliberately every paycheck and never accomplish, while paying yourselves millionaire wages at our expense.
The Government can afford the Dept. of Homeland Security's purchases of millions of rounds of ammo, advanced armored vehicles and population terror weapons (oh, and thousands of drones), but can't pay the bills, keep the lights on, regulate industry, fix the roadways, or secure the borders.
Washington D.C. is a national disgrace.
But, what about so many of these events that were in the media cycle for a day or two, and then disappeared from the radar?
There were several man-made events these past few months that leave one wondering just what is going on?
We had several oil pipeline failures around the time the debate over pipeline construction was in the media, some of those dumped quite a bit of crude in places like Arkansas, were these incidents coincidences, or acts of sabotage by anti-development extremists?
The explosion of the fertilizer plant in Texas has been knocked off the news by recent events, who or what caused that massive explosion?
Other chemical facilities have experienced incidents, are these industrial accidents, or attacks on infrastructure?
While the recent spate of road and bridge failures appear to be nothing more than government dereliction of duty and criminal negligence, if our bridges are so weakened that a minor incident can bring them down, how susceptible to a terror attack would our roads and highways be?
With the long-running problems at a couple of nuclear plants back in the news, we need to know if the atomic energy industry is in as bad a shape as the rest of the country's infrastructure.
Like our outdated and failing power networks, or our water, sewage, and garbage systems.
Strange that these government types can find all the money they need to put a rifle to the heads of the people, but can't fix the damn roads.
You know, the job you steal extra money from us for deliberately every paycheck and never accomplish, while paying yourselves millionaire wages at our expense.
The Government can afford the Dept. of Homeland Security's purchases of millions of rounds of ammo, advanced armored vehicles and population terror weapons (oh, and thousands of drones), but can't pay the bills, keep the lights on, regulate industry, fix the roadways, or secure the borders.
Washington D.C. is a national disgrace.
Saturday, May 25, 2013
The GOP, Still Trying to Ride the TEA Party's Coattails.
I am sick and tired of seeing MSM zombies lumping the TEA Party and Libertarians with the GOP. The GOP does not represent TEA Party and Libertarian interests. The TEA Party and Libertarian Movement are not part of the Republican Party.
During the elections of 2010 the Republican Party attempted a huge, multi-year, multi-regional, push to co-opt the TEA Party and other Patriot movements into the RINOs' big tent. These efforts included huge, corporate funding for pseudo-patriot groups that would divert money and voters from the actual, independent political groups that had sprung up as a direct challenge to RINO, Corporate-fed, fascism. The astro-turfers had quite a bit of success in forcing out the original, grassroots activists and where they didn't succeed, they went even farther.
Paid Republican Party Members, like the now infamous "Libertarian" Wayne Allen Root, used GOPer money and a cadre of GOPer members who "joined" his regional Libertarian Party, eventually taking control of the groups' administration, as means to prevent the emergence of a real, independent, political party that would sweep the criminal sewage known as the Republican Party from national relevance. His efforts became completely clear in September of 2012, when Wayne Root publicly "rejoined" the Republican Party and attempted to drag as many Libertarian voters over to the ILLEGAL Mitt Romney campaign as possible. Crime and treason need not be worried about.
In the years prior to 2012, many regional Republican Party hacks took to local airwaves via talk radio, telling the public quite brazenly that the GOP's set purpose was to co-opt or destroy the TEA Party movement and the other independent political parties, of which the Libertarians were the greatest threat to the status quo, one-party rule of Washington D.C.
The Democratic Party's claims of astro-turfing, and of the TEA Party being a corporate-based shill were at least partially true, except that the targets of their ire had been created and funded directly by GOP interests and money, not by independent groups of local voters, as the actual TEA Party groups and Libs were.
Now we have a slew of scandals in the Capitol, where agency after agency, and politician after politician, have been found actively subverting and suppressing the political activity of Americans. These Americans were targeted by race (African-Americans, Jews, and Whites), class and incomes, and other factors, but the intentions of the guilty were the same in all cases, that of a ruling class preventing the criminal punishment of its own members for the crimes they have committed.
You're bought and paid for Americans, don't you notice there's a collar round your necks?
I will never support the GOP for any reason. I'd rather see the nation die than allow the status quo to continue. The extermination of Washington D.C. from American society must occur.
During the elections of 2010 the Republican Party attempted a huge, multi-year, multi-regional, push to co-opt the TEA Party and other Patriot movements into the RINOs' big tent. These efforts included huge, corporate funding for pseudo-patriot groups that would divert money and voters from the actual, independent political groups that had sprung up as a direct challenge to RINO, Corporate-fed, fascism. The astro-turfers had quite a bit of success in forcing out the original, grassroots activists and where they didn't succeed, they went even farther.
Paid Republican Party Members, like the now infamous "Libertarian" Wayne Allen Root, used GOPer money and a cadre of GOPer members who "joined" his regional Libertarian Party, eventually taking control of the groups' administration, as means to prevent the emergence of a real, independent, political party that would sweep the criminal sewage known as the Republican Party from national relevance. His efforts became completely clear in September of 2012, when Wayne Root publicly "rejoined" the Republican Party and attempted to drag as many Libertarian voters over to the ILLEGAL Mitt Romney campaign as possible. Crime and treason need not be worried about.
In the years prior to 2012, many regional Republican Party hacks took to local airwaves via talk radio, telling the public quite brazenly that the GOP's set purpose was to co-opt or destroy the TEA Party movement and the other independent political parties, of which the Libertarians were the greatest threat to the status quo, one-party rule of Washington D.C.
The Democratic Party's claims of astro-turfing, and of the TEA Party being a corporate-based shill were at least partially true, except that the targets of their ire had been created and funded directly by GOP interests and money, not by independent groups of local voters, as the actual TEA Party groups and Libs were.
Now we have a slew of scandals in the Capitol, where agency after agency, and politician after politician, have been found actively subverting and suppressing the political activity of Americans. These Americans were targeted by race (African-Americans, Jews, and Whites), class and incomes, and other factors, but the intentions of the guilty were the same in all cases, that of a ruling class preventing the criminal punishment of its own members for the crimes they have committed.
You're bought and paid for Americans, don't you notice there's a collar round your necks?
I will never support the GOP for any reason. I'd rather see the nation die than allow the status quo to continue. The extermination of Washington D.C. from American society must occur.
The Day After: New Book on JFK brings his admiration of Nazism to light.
God has an impeccable sense of timing.
Just a day ago, I published a blog entry about the illegal nomination of Mittens Romney, the criminals behind his campaign, and the GOPer calls of anti-semitism against Ron Paul.
BTW FoxNews Viewers, if Ron Paul was antisemitic, why didn't the Democrats ever say so?
Today, news outlets are reporting that a new biographical study of JFK's personal papers has revealed his admiration for Hitler's Germany. This is in keeping with his father, who had business and personal ties to the Nazi regime prior to the war as well.
So to state yet again, a United States President's personal feelings, antisemitic or not, have had little to do with national policies towards our ally Israel or support for the Jewish people.
Until now. The current, Democratic administration is the most openly, antisemitic American government since the end of WWII.
Why? Because not only is it apparent that our current leader and his cronies care little for Israeli concerns, but they are openly pro-Islamic, actively supporting Muslim extremism and violence around the world and facilitating and supporting Muslim emigration into the West.
More riots today in Sweden, another copy cat butchery in Britain.
Keep thinking that GOP is somehow different from the rest of government.
Just a day ago, I published a blog entry about the illegal nomination of Mittens Romney, the criminals behind his campaign, and the GOPer calls of anti-semitism against Ron Paul.
BTW FoxNews Viewers, if Ron Paul was antisemitic, why didn't the Democrats ever say so?
Today, news outlets are reporting that a new biographical study of JFK's personal papers has revealed his admiration for Hitler's Germany. This is in keeping with his father, who had business and personal ties to the Nazi regime prior to the war as well.
So to state yet again, a United States President's personal feelings, antisemitic or not, have had little to do with national policies towards our ally Israel or support for the Jewish people.
Until now. The current, Democratic administration is the most openly, antisemitic American government since the end of WWII.
Why? Because not only is it apparent that our current leader and his cronies care little for Israeli concerns, but they are openly pro-Islamic, actively supporting Muslim extremism and violence around the world and facilitating and supporting Muslim emigration into the West.
More riots today in Sweden, another copy cat butchery in Britain.
Keep thinking that GOP is somehow different from the rest of government.
Friday, May 24, 2013
The State, Incompetent, Violent, Criminal, and FAILED.
What do British Prime Minister Cameron, French President Sarkozy, and Germany's Merkel all have in common? Since 2010, all have publicly admitted that the policies of a multicultural state in Europe have been abject failures.
The most recent items to make news are the now annually occurring Islamic riots in Europe, this year destroying Sweden, a nation known for its' progressive, rational, and inclusive policies. High unemployment, racial and societal tensions, and failure of migrant populations to assimilate are among the causes blamed for an as of now five/six days of repeated racial and ethnic rioting.
In Jolly-Ole England, an off-duty soldier was run over with a car and then beheaded with a meat cleaver by two Muslims. Who then aired the entire crime on the Internet and gave a bloody rant about their attack.
Both men were shot when armed police arrived and are now in custody.
A disarmed populace is now at the mercy of these random extremists. How's those Marxist-based ideals about state monopoly of violence working for you lately?
You see, in the E.U. and Britain, you don't have the right to defend your life or property, so the criminals always get the first strike.
As for failures of the grand state authority here at home, another bridge collapsed on a major, American interstate yesterday, with no word on death toll or injured as of last night (wouldn't want to disturb the indentured servants going into the weekend, now would we?). Strange, I remember billions of dollars going specifically for "shovel ready" jobs that focused particularly on infrastructure, particularly on public works, particularly on bridges and similar structures on our roads and highways.
And I particularly remember, nothing ever actually got done other than union leadership and the usual political classes in D.C. and elsewhere getting well-paid at the taxpayer's eternal trough of free money.
Because having roads that don't fall down and kill you are so overrated.
Someone please remind us why we pay these failures in public office anything at all? Why, if they are incapable of the most basic functions of government, we continue to allow these folks to exist in our societies?
A government that can't keep the roads built, nor the lights on, nor the borders secured, nor the people safe, is nothing more than parasites gorging on the public largess.
Of course, the Swedes, British, and American peoples will continue to be obediently herded like cattle by these political scum in charge, because the armed criminals that work for them will ensure that with threats of violent death, prison, and confiscation of property.
The fact that these government thugs can never seem to use any of that violence to actually punish or threaten the criminals notwithstanding.
Speaking of threatening evil or punishing the criminal, President Barack Obama gave a speechifying apologetic in which he revealed that three other American citizens had been murdered by drone strikes besides suspected Islamic militant Anwar al-Awlaki.
According to fearless leader, these acts are legal, and he's very upset over all the non-combatants that have been killed "by accident".
Gee, isn't killing masses of uninvolved, innocent, bystanders what a couple of terrorist bombers were just hunted down for in Boston a while back?
The United States continues to devolve into something resembling a Peronist' state, while the E.U. looks not unlike some sub-Saharan war zone.
The pseudo-aristocracy and their "we know better" technocrats have utterly failed. Now they're simply amassing power and monopolizing armed force to prevent being held accountable for their own criminal acts. Murder in the streets, murder in the halls of government, failure to provide the most basic public requirements for the people...
How long O'Lord before we get rid of these criminals once and for all?
The most recent items to make news are the now annually occurring Islamic riots in Europe, this year destroying Sweden, a nation known for its' progressive, rational, and inclusive policies. High unemployment, racial and societal tensions, and failure of migrant populations to assimilate are among the causes blamed for an as of now five/six days of repeated racial and ethnic rioting.
In Jolly-Ole England, an off-duty soldier was run over with a car and then beheaded with a meat cleaver by two Muslims. Who then aired the entire crime on the Internet and gave a bloody rant about their attack.
Both men were shot when armed police arrived and are now in custody.
A disarmed populace is now at the mercy of these random extremists. How's those Marxist-based ideals about state monopoly of violence working for you lately?
You see, in the E.U. and Britain, you don't have the right to defend your life or property, so the criminals always get the first strike.
As for failures of the grand state authority here at home, another bridge collapsed on a major, American interstate yesterday, with no word on death toll or injured as of last night (wouldn't want to disturb the indentured servants going into the weekend, now would we?). Strange, I remember billions of dollars going specifically for "shovel ready" jobs that focused particularly on infrastructure, particularly on public works, particularly on bridges and similar structures on our roads and highways.
And I particularly remember, nothing ever actually got done other than union leadership and the usual political classes in D.C. and elsewhere getting well-paid at the taxpayer's eternal trough of free money.
Because having roads that don't fall down and kill you are so overrated.
Someone please remind us why we pay these failures in public office anything at all? Why, if they are incapable of the most basic functions of government, we continue to allow these folks to exist in our societies?
A government that can't keep the roads built, nor the lights on, nor the borders secured, nor the people safe, is nothing more than parasites gorging on the public largess.
Of course, the Swedes, British, and American peoples will continue to be obediently herded like cattle by these political scum in charge, because the armed criminals that work for them will ensure that with threats of violent death, prison, and confiscation of property.
The fact that these government thugs can never seem to use any of that violence to actually punish or threaten the criminals notwithstanding.
Speaking of threatening evil or punishing the criminal, President Barack Obama gave a speechifying apologetic in which he revealed that three other American citizens had been murdered by drone strikes besides suspected Islamic militant Anwar al-Awlaki.
According to fearless leader, these acts are legal, and he's very upset over all the non-combatants that have been killed "by accident".
Gee, isn't killing masses of uninvolved, innocent, bystanders what a couple of terrorist bombers were just hunted down for in Boston a while back?
The United States continues to devolve into something resembling a Peronist' state, while the E.U. looks not unlike some sub-Saharan war zone.
The pseudo-aristocracy and their "we know better" technocrats have utterly failed. Now they're simply amassing power and monopolizing armed force to prevent being held accountable for their own criminal acts. Murder in the streets, murder in the halls of government, failure to provide the most basic public requirements for the people...
How long O'Lord before we get rid of these criminals once and for all?
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Once more on Antisemitism and the Obama Administration for the FoxNews Viewers
Okay Tim, the overwhelming response has said, "Why, if the President's peccadilloes on Israel and Jews aren't important, has the Obama administration been so antisemitic compared with past administrations?"
Simple. Because while other Presidents have often been antisemitic in belief, they were not pro-Islamic in practice.
President Barack Obama is not just an antisemite, he's a cheerleader for the Islamic caliphate.
President Obama doesn't just not care much for Jews or Israel, he hates them and actively supports their enemies, as does the Democratic Party.
I have often wondered why so-named "liberals" (there's nothing liberal about them), support genital mutilation, the execution of homosexuals, the abuse of women and adolescents: physically, emotionally, sexually, by violence and by law, and yet complain about the so-called "intolerance" of American society at the drop of a hat.
Islam murders girls for going to school. Islam murders gays for being homosexual. Islam believes there is no age of consent for marriage or sexual relations with girls/women. Islam believes a woman is one-half of a man. Islam demands morality laws in all aspects of private lives, and demands submission by all members of society, consent is not needed.
Islam believes in the divine right of a ruling, religious class to literally hold guns to the heads of your children and demand whatever they see fit.
Yet there are no more cautious, forgiving, or silent enablers of these criminals than the American Democrat.
Recently, a few braver souls from the Democratic Party and media came forward and ashamedly admitted why this was the case; that they were afraid of Muslim violence if they dared criticise the crimes of these folks.
I have no use for cowards--these guys' beliefs are nothing more than convenience.
And the GOPers have purposely elected these guys because they couldn't get their Wall-Street poster boy elected by lawful or unlawful means.
The GOP is just as crooked, spoiled, and arrogant as the rest of this trash.
Death to the lot of them.
Simple. Because while other Presidents have often been antisemitic in belief, they were not pro-Islamic in practice.
President Barack Obama is not just an antisemite, he's a cheerleader for the Islamic caliphate.
President Obama doesn't just not care much for Jews or Israel, he hates them and actively supports their enemies, as does the Democratic Party.
I have often wondered why so-named "liberals" (there's nothing liberal about them), support genital mutilation, the execution of homosexuals, the abuse of women and adolescents: physically, emotionally, sexually, by violence and by law, and yet complain about the so-called "intolerance" of American society at the drop of a hat.
Islam murders girls for going to school. Islam murders gays for being homosexual. Islam believes there is no age of consent for marriage or sexual relations with girls/women. Islam believes a woman is one-half of a man. Islam demands morality laws in all aspects of private lives, and demands submission by all members of society, consent is not needed.
Islam believes in the divine right of a ruling, religious class to literally hold guns to the heads of your children and demand whatever they see fit.
Yet there are no more cautious, forgiving, or silent enablers of these criminals than the American Democrat.
Recently, a few braver souls from the Democratic Party and media came forward and ashamedly admitted why this was the case; that they were afraid of Muslim violence if they dared criticise the crimes of these folks.
I have no use for cowards--these guys' beliefs are nothing more than convenience.
And the GOPers have purposely elected these guys because they couldn't get their Wall-Street poster boy elected by lawful or unlawful means.
The GOP is just as crooked, spoiled, and arrogant as the rest of this trash.
Death to the lot of them.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)